Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 14:12

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Becky Lynch wins the Intercontinental title at Money in the Bank - Cageside Seats
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Thank you.
In the Belly of This Beast, a Major Find - Newser
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Trump gets back behind raids in immigration whiplash - Axios
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Tesla after Trump - Financial Times
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
J.M. Smucker Earnings: SJM Stock Slumps on Disappointing Fiscal 2026 Outlook - Barron's
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Can someone write me a sex story?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Denver Health sees increase in people getting MMR vaccine - 9News
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years: